<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Reasons : Why Flex wins over Silverlight :)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/</link>
	<description>Adobe Certified Expert</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>"... for me as the developer, there’s not a big difference between true open source and “source available”"

Ah well. There is a strategic difference, yes. For me as a developer or TI manager, this means that I could fix bugs or improve things myself. I could take the framework to different directions if that makes sense to my company. But the most important thing perhaps is that I wouldn't be tied to an unique vendor. I'd not be locked in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; for me as the developer, there’s not a big difference between true open source and “source available”&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah well. There is a strategic difference, yes. For me as a developer or TI manager, this means that I could fix bugs or improve things myself. I could take the framework to different directions if that makes sense to my company. But the most important thing perhaps is that I wouldn&#8217;t be tied to an unique vendor. I&#8217;d not be locked in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xakevxwosy</title>
		<link>http://www.anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>xakevxwosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! vhjvkqvkgnszb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! vhjvkqvkgnszb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 + 2 unbitable reason why flex not &#8220;silverlight&#8221; in current scenario &#171; BK Flex</title>
		<link>http://www.anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>10 + 2 unbitable reason why flex not &#8220;silverlight&#8221; in current scenario &#171; BK Flex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] flex not &#8220;silverlight&#8221; in current&#160;scenario  26 06 2007   My friend Anand bloged 10 + 2 unbitable reason why flex not &#8220;silverlight&#8221; in current [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] flex not &#8220;silverlight&#8221; in current&nbsp;scenario  26 06 2007   My friend Anand bloged 10 + 2 unbitable reason why flex not &#8220;silverlight&#8221; in current [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borek</title>
		<link>http://www.anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Borek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anandvardhan.com/2007/06/26/top-10-reasons-why-flex-wins-against-silverlight/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Flex is a good platform but this list requires a few comments.

Maturity and penetration are probably the biggest advantages of Flex. It is inevitable, thought, that this advantage will vanish over time so the points 1, 2, part of 4 and 8 will become irrelevant (but they certainly apply right now).

Point 3 (any server-side technology) is not an advantage of Flex. The same applies to Silverlight.

Point 4 (components) has more to do with maturity of frameworks. I don’t see any technical advantages to Flex’s extensibility mechanism over other technologies (to be honest, I think there are some great reserves in the Flex extensibility today).

Point 5 (.NET services support, or current lack of it) is presented as an advantage?

Point 6 (sockets) – sockets are definitely considered for final release (according to Silverlight forums).

Point 9 (Flex  AIR) is really an important advantage. I like this feature very much.

Also the Open Source thing is nice even though for me as the developer, there’s not a big difference between true open source and “source available”. Because of the reflection support in .NET, I can always examine internal workings of any .NET component – and this is what really matters for me.

Quite honestly, as the Flex platform is several years older than Silverlight, I would expect this list to be a bit more exciting. Because Silverlight can offer some very exciting features compared to Flex.

Regards,
Borek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flex is a good platform but this list requires a few comments.</p>
<p>Maturity and penetration are probably the biggest advantages of Flex. It is inevitable, thought, that this advantage will vanish over time so the points 1, 2, part of 4 and 8 will become irrelevant (but they certainly apply right now).</p>
<p>Point 3 (any server-side technology) is not an advantage of Flex. The same applies to Silverlight.</p>
<p>Point 4 (components) has more to do with maturity of frameworks. I don’t see any technical advantages to Flex’s extensibility mechanism over other technologies (to be honest, I think there are some great reserves in the Flex extensibility today).</p>
<p>Point 5 (.NET services support, or current lack of it) is presented as an advantage?</p>
<p>Point 6 (sockets) – sockets are definitely considered for final release (according to Silverlight forums).</p>
<p>Point 9 (Flex  AIR) is really an important advantage. I like this feature very much.</p>
<p>Also the Open Source thing is nice even though for me as the developer, there’s not a big difference between true open source and “source available”. Because of the reflection support in .NET, I can always examine internal workings of any .NET component – and this is what really matters for me.</p>
<p>Quite honestly, as the Flex platform is several years older than Silverlight, I would expect this list to be a bit more exciting. Because Silverlight can offer some very exciting features compared to Flex.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Borek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
